Preeclampsia and the challenge of early prediction: reality or utopia? State of art and critical review of literature

Purpose: The challenge to obtain improved predictive tools, able to identify women destined to develop preeclampsia (PE), is raising the interest of researchers for the attractive chance to allow for timely initiation of prophylactic therapy, appropriate antenatal surveillance, and better-targeted research into preventive interventions. We aimed to gather all the evidence reported up to now in scientific literature relating to all prediction tests for PE. Materials and methods: We searched articles on conventional literature platforms from January 1952 to August 2016, using the terms “preeclampsia,” “gestational preeclampsia,” and “gestational hypertensive disorders” combined with “predictive test” and “risk assessment.” Abstracts/titles identified by the search were screened by three investigators. Results: The search identified 203 citations, of which 154 potentially relevant after the initial evaluation. Among these studies, 20 full articles were excluded, therefore, 134 primary studies met the criteria for inclusion and were analyzed. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that a combination of several features may provide the best predictive accuracy for the identification of PE. Large-scale, multicenter, multiethnic, prospective trials are required to propose an ideal combination of markers for routine screening.