Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIME
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Competenze

Competenze e Professionalità
Logo UNIME

|

UNIFIND - Competenze e Professionalità

unime.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Impact of atorvastatin or rosuvastatin co-administration on platelet reactivity in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2015
Abstract:
Background: Residual high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) still represents a challenging matter in patients with coronary artery disease. Drug-to-drug interaction has been suggested between some statin and antiplatelet agents, despite their co-administration is mandatory in patients after an acute cardiovascular event or coronary stenting. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate any impact of rosuvastatin or atorvastatin co-administration on platelet reactivity in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Methods: Our population is represented by patients on DAPT (ASA and either clopidogrel 75 mg or ticagrelor 90 mg b.i.d) after an ACS or percutaneous revascularization, and receiving rosuvastatin or atorvastatin. Platelet function was assessed by Multiplate Impedance Aggregometry (Roche Diagnostics AG). Results: We included a total of 374 patients, 240 (64.2%) receiving atorvastatin, 134 (35.8%) rosuvastatin. Rosuvastatin treated patients were more often using beta-blockers (p ¼ 0.05), diuretics (p ¼ 0.04) and displayed higher HDL (p < 0.001) and lower LDL cholesterol (p < 0.001). The prevalence of HRPR for ASA was low, with no difference according to statin type (0.8% vs 1.5%, p ¼ 0.62, adjusted OR[95%CI] ¼ 2[0.23 e16.6], p ¼ 0.52). Concerning ADP-antagonists, in the 163 patients treated with clopidogrel, rosuvastatin co-administration was associated with a significantly increased rate of HRPR (55.6%vs 32%, p ¼ 0.01, adjusted OR[95%CI] ¼ 2.69[1.22e5.96], p ¼ 0.015) with higher ADP-mediated platelet reactivity (p ¼ 0.01) and TRAP-test results (p ¼ 0.04). On the contrary, in the 211 ticagrelor treated patients, statin type did not affect mean platelet reactivity or the prevalence of HRPR with ticagrelor (10.5% vs 11.2%, p ¼ 0.99, adjusted OR[95%CI] ¼ 0.86[0.34e2.22], p ¼ 0.76) Conclusions: Among patients receiving DAPT, rosuvastatin but not atorvastatin is associated with an increased rate of HRPR for clopidogrel, without any influence on the antiplatelet effect of ASA or tica- grelor. Therefore, cautiousness should be exerted for clopidogrel and rosuvastatin therapeutic association.
Tipologia CRIS:
14.a.1 Articolo su rivista
Keywords:
Clopidogrel,Cythocromes,Rosuvastatin,Ticagrelor
Elenco autori:
Verdoia, Monica; Nardin, Matteo; Sartori, Chiara; Pergolini, Patrizia; Rolla, Roberta; Barbieri, Lucia; Marino, Paolo; Bellomo, Giorgio; Suryapranata, Harry; DE LUCA, Giuseppe
Autori di Ateneo:
DE LUCA Giuseppe
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unime.it/handle/11570/3256396
Pubblicato in:
ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Journal
  • Dati Generali

Dati Generali

URL

https://www.atherosclerosis-journal.com/article/S0021-9150(15)30152-0/fulltext
  • Informazioni
  • Assistenza
  • Accessibilità
  • Privacy
  • Utilizzo dei cookie
  • Note legali

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.0.0