Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIME
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Competenze

Competenze e Professionalità
Logo UNIME

|

UNIFIND - Competenze e Professionalità

unime.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Drug-eluting balloon versus standard balloon angioplasty for infrapopliteal arterial revascularization in critical limb ischemia: 12-Month results from the IN.PACT deep randomized trial

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2014
Abstract:
Background Drug-eluting balloons (DEB) may reduce infrapopliteal restenosis and reintervention rates versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and improve wound healing/limb preservation.Objectives The goal of this clinical trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of IN.PACT Amphirion drug-eluting balloons (IA-DEB) compared to PTA for infrapopliteal arterial revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).Methods Within a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial with independent clinical event adjudication and angiographic and wound core laboratories 358 CLI patients were randomized 2:1 to IA-DEB or PTA. The 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints through 12 months were clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and late lumen loss (LLL). The primary safety endpoint through 6 months was a composite of all-cause mortality, major amputation, and CD-TLR.Results Clinical characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Significant baseline differences between the IA-DEB and PTA arms included mean lesion length (10.2 cm vs. 12.9 cm; p = 0.002), impaired inflow (40.7% vs. 28.8%; p = 0.035), and previous target limb revascularization (32.2% vs. 21.8%; p = 0.047). Primary efficacy results of IA-DEB versus PTA were CD-TLR of 9.2% versus 13.1% (p = 0.291) and LLL of 0.61 ± 0.78 mm versus 0.62 ± 0.78 mm (p = 0.950). Primary safety endpoints were 17.7% versus 15.8% (p = 0.021) and met the noninferiority hypothesis. A safety signal driven by major amputations through 12 months was observed in the IA-DEB arm versus the PTA arm (8.8% vs. 3.6%; p = 0.080).Conclusions In patients with CLI, IA-DEB had comparable efficacy to PTA. While primary safety was met, there was a trend towards an increased major amputation rate through 12 months compared to PTA. (Study of IN.PACT Amphirion™ Drug Eluting Balloon vs. Standard PTA for the Treatment of Below the Knee Critical Limb Ischemia [INPACT-DEEP]; NCT00941733).
Tipologia CRIS:
14.a.1 Articolo su rivista
Keywords:
critical limb ischemia; drug-eluting balloon; peripheral vascular disease; Aged; Angiography; Angioplasty, Balloon; Arterial Occlusive Diseases; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Ischemia; Leg; Male; Prospective Studies; Single-Blind Method; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Surgical Procedures; Drug-Eluting Stents; Popliteal Artery
Elenco autori:
Zeller, T.; Baumgartner, I.; Scheinert, D.; Brodmann, M.; Bosiers, M.; Micari, A.; Peeters, P.; Vermassen, F.; Landini, M.; Snead, D. B.; Kent, K. C.; Rocha-Singh, K. J.
Autori di Ateneo:
MICARI Antonio
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unime.it/handle/11570/3194498
Pubblicato in:
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Journal
  • Informazioni
  • Assistenza
  • Accessibilità
  • Privacy
  • Utilizzo dei cookie
  • Note legali

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.0.0